Dsh Verify MCP server
io.github.263311487-ux/dsh-verify·v0.9.6·2 starsAgent-built web app quality gate. Real browser is the judge. PASS/FAIL with receipts.
2 stars510 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Dsh Verify yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Dsh Verify tools (4, 1 write)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postsRead from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.
generate_and_verifyAI-drafts an acceptance checklist for a URL (LLM writes it, a real browser executes it), then immediately runs it in real Chromium.
healthCheck that the dsh-verify MCP server and its Chromium browser are ready to run verifications.
verify_specwrite actionRun a dsh-verify acceptance spec (JSON file, or glob) against a real headless Chromium.
verify_urlVerify a live URL against a list of human-style checks, driven by a real headless Chromium.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-31 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- Code scan13 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 3 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
How Dsh Verify compares
Against every graded Scraping and browsing MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 89/100
- higher than 77% of 867 Scraping and browsing servers
- Tools
- 4
- the typical Scraping and browsing server has 6
- Tools that change things
- 25%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- GitHub stars
- 2
- more than 65% of 584 Scraping and browsing servers
- Downloads a week
- 510
- more than 85% of 312 Scraping and browsing servers with a package
What its tools let an agent do: 2 read · 1 create · 1 change
Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-08-26, latest 2026-10-09, typically one every 44 days.
Install Dsh Verify in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
Runs npx -y dsh-verify on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.
claude mcp add dsh-verify -- npx -y dsh-verify
What the publisher says
From the Dsh Verify repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
dsh-verify
中文 | English
Witness — The browser is the judge.
The quality gate for agent-built web apps. Agents say done; the browser proves it.
(Witness is the product name; dsh-verify is the package name — same thing.)
If Witness catches something for you, ⭐ star the repo — it's how this project stays alive.
You asked an AI to build a web app. It said "done." Does it actually work?
dsh-verify opens a real browser and checks — so you never have to take the agent's word for it.
The quality gate for agent-built web apps. Works with any agent — DeepSeek Harness (dsh), Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Codex — and with any CI. You write what a human would check in a browser; a real browser executes it and returns a PASS/FAIL verdict with receipts (screenshots + diff images).
No LLM judges the outcome. The browser is the judge.
Same task. Same AI. Two builds. One missing CSS rule — the agent's self-review passed, a real browser caught it.
Why this exists
We ran a 4-agent web team (spec writer → frontend dev → QA → reviewer). Their own review said:
✅ "All requirements met. No issues found."
In a real browser, the dark-mode toggle did nothing — the .dark class was toggled, but the CSS rule was never written. Every agent self-test passed because there was nothing in the page for the agents to run. No one opened a real browser.
That's the gap: agents verify against what they believe they built, not against what a user actually experiences. Unit tests and static checks can't catch a missing CSS rule.
Same page. Same JS. One missing CSS rule. Two different verdicts.
Why not just ...?
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Dsh Verify: common questions
- Is Dsh Verify MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (89/100). Read the Dsh Verify safety report
- How do I install Dsh Verify?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Dsh Verify need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Dsh Verify maintained?
- The last commit was 9 days ago (2026-10-28). The latest release is v0.9.6.
- What can I use instead of Dsh Verify?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: SeleniumBase MCP server, AIHawk MCP server and Browser Use MCP server. Compare all Dsh Verify alternatives.
- How does Dsh Verify compare with other Scraping and browsing MCP servers?
- safety score 89/100 (higher than 77% of 867 Scraping and browsing servers); tools 4 (the typical Scraping and browsing server has 6); tools that change things 25% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.
Alternatives to Dsh Verify
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- SeleniumBase MCPStealthy browser automation, testing, and web-scraping via CDP Mode.not reviewedWidely usedA
- AIHawkAI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.not reviewedWidely usedA
- Browser UseBrowser agents and stealth cloud browsers for AI: run web tasks, fill forms, extract data.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Web Browser (kogiQA)This web browser has been designed to help your agent debug and develop complex web applications.not reviewedEstablishedC
- ScrapelessWeb search, browser automation, scraping, crawling and CAPTCHA solving for AI agents.not reviewedEstablishedA
