Is Codex Supervisor MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Codex Supervisor compares
Against every graded Databases MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 77/100
- higher than 40% of 803 Databases servers
- Tools that change things
- 21%
- typical: 10%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 15 read · 2 create · 1 change · 1 delete
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-13 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan24 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (2)
- mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.script - mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.scriptpackage.json: …, "LICENSE" ], "scripts": { "postinstall": "node ./src/setup.js --auto --quiet", …
Overall 77/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Codex Supervisor does
- RememLocal-first automatic memory for Claude Code and Codex: capture, distill, recall from SQLite.not reviewedEstablishedB
- DBHubToken-efficient database MCP server for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLitenot reviewedWidely usedA
MindwtrTask automation via SQLite, desktop Local API, or Mindwtr Cloud; read-only by default.not reviewedEstablishedA