MCP.Market

Is Codex Supervisor MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B77/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Codex Supervisor compares

Against every graded Databases MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
77/100
higher than 40% of 803 Databases servers
Tools that change things
21%
typical: 10%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 15 read · 2 create · 1 change · 1 delete

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-13 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium
  • Code scan24 source files scanned15/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

Findings (2)

  • mediumnpm install lifecycle script presentinstall.script
  • mediumnpm install lifecycle script presentinstall.script
    package.json: …, "LICENSE" ], "scripts": { "postinstall": "node ./src/setup.js --auto --quiet", …
Overall 77/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what Codex Supervisor does

  • Remem
    Local-first automatic memory for Claude Code and Codex: capture, distill, recall from SQLite.
    B
  • DBHub
    Token-efficient database MCP server for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLite
    A
  • Mindwtr
    Task automation via SQLite, desktop Local API, or Mindwtr Cloud; read-only by default.
    A

Codex Supervisor reviews, tools and install