Is BioMCP-TS MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How BioMCP-TS compares
Against every graded Databases MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 75/100
- higher than 35% of 802 Databases servers
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 10%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 56 read
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-15 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan7 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/bundle.js: …&&(u=this.opts.code.process(u,t));let m=new Function(`${ds.default.self}`,`${ds.default.scope…
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what BioMCP-TS does
- EnsemblLook up genes, sequences, variants, homologs, and cross-database xrefs from Ensembl REST.not reviewedGrowingA
- DBHubToken-efficient database MCP server for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLitenot reviewedWidely usedA
- MotherduckSQL analytics and data engineering for AI Assistants and IDEsnot reviewedEstablishedA