Is Aifp MCP server safe?

Probably. Read the findings first.

C60/100grade C

Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.

How Aifp compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 60/100; higher than 15% of 48,255 servers
Tools that change things: 6%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 28 read · 1 create · 3 change · 1 send or post

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium

Code scan36 source files scanned15/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
Maintenancelast push 76 days ago12/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10

mediumnpm install lifecycle script presentinstall.script

package.json: …"tsc", "prepublishOnly": "tsc", "postinstall": "node scripts/postinstall.mjs", "bu…

Overall 60/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Deja Vu
deja-vu: local memory over the session histories of forty-three coding agents.
not reviewed
Established
A
Memorix
Local-first project memory with legacy MCP and 2026 discovery compatibility.
not reviewed
Established
B
Nautilus Compass Memory
Local-first long-term memory for AI agents, with byte-recomputable signed verification receipts.
not reviewed
Established
B