Is Sentinel Scan MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Sentinel Scan compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 77/100
- higher than 50% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 50%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 3 read · 1 change · 1 send or post · 1 run or deploy
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-31 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan5 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 67 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (1)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truebin/sentinel-scan.js: … 'input. Use an argument-vector API (no shell=True/os.system), an ' + 'allow-listed …
Overall 77/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Sentinel Scan does
- Agent Security ScannerSecurity layer for AI agents: blocks prompt injection, detects fake packages, scans vulnerabilities.not reviewedEstablishedC
- ShellwardAI agent security: 7 MCP tools for injection detection, PII scanning, command safety, DLP.not reviewedEstablishedA
- HOL GuardLocal-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.not reviewedEstablishedA
