Is Nslookup MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
How Nslookup compares
Against every graded Maps and travel MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 75/100
- higher than 45% of 679 Maps and travel servers
- Tools that change things
- 9%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote Maps and travel server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 21 read · 2 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-07 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- Code scan15 source files scanned25/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1516ms20/20
- Tool poisoning23 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 2 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancelast push 113 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ4/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Nslookup does
- geo-scoreFree 0-100 score: can AI engines cite a site? Plus citation checks with your own API keys.not reviewedEstablishedB
- France DataFrench public-data MCP: cross-ref health, demographics, business, geo & real-estate.not reviewedGrowingA
- NodeMavenNodeMaven residential proxies: geo-targeted proxy URLs, sticky sessions, checks and usagenot reviewedGrowingA
