
Is Shodh Memory MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
How Shodh Memory compares
Against every graded Web search MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 68/100
- higher than 30% of 3,443 Web search servers
- Tools that change things
- 21%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 26 read · 3 create · 5 change · 4 delete
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-12 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan2 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 3 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (2)
- mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.script - mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.scriptpackage.json: …coverage": "vitest run --coverage", "postinstall": "node scripts/postinstall.cjs", "pr…
Overall 68/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Shodh Memory does
- not reviewedEstablishedA
- CrgToken-efficient code review knowledge graph: semantic search and call-graph resolution.not reviewedEstablishedB
- Ori MemoryPersistent memory infrastructure for AI agents. Identity, knowledge graph, and search.not reviewedEstablishedA