Is trovex MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How trovex compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 75/100
- higher than 45% of 48,243 servers
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 1 read
Release history: 3 versions in the registry since 2026-09-03, latest 2026-09-27, typically one every 23 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-16 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan57 source files scanned; 57 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 3 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (2)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaltrovex-0.16.1/src/trovex/cli.py: ….Option("gpt-5.4-mini", help="LLM for --eval (answers + judges)."), json_out: bool… - mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaltrovex-0.16.1/src/trovex/cli.py: ….Option("gpt-5.4-mini", help="LLM for --eval (answers + judges)."), json_out: bool…
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what trovex does
- Codebase MemoryCodebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.not reviewedWidely usedC
TraceCode graph MCP: 81 languages, 91 frameworks, 72.7% fewer PR-review tokens, comprehension at paritynot reviewedEstablishedA- HonchoMemory that reasons: continual learning for stateful agents. Better context, fewer tokens.not reviewedEstablishedA
