Is Trusty Squire MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Trusty Squire compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 83/100
- higher than 68% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 15 read
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan103 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 2 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/bot/browser.js: …obe = await this.page .$eval(selector, (el) => { cons…
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Trusty Squire does
- AttestixAI agent identity, signed credentials, delegated authority and governance evidence.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Emilia ProtocolExact-action approval for consequential agent actions: request, track, and verify signed receipts.not reviewedEstablishedB
three.ws ProvenanceAppend-only, signed, on-chain-verifiable agent action log — record and audit what agents did.not reviewedEstablishedB
