MCP.Market

Is Tldraw MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B83/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

What to know before installing
  • highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication

How Tldraw compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
83/100
higher than 65% of 45,646 servers
Tools that change things
17%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%

What its tools let an agent do: 4 read · 1 create · 1 run or deploy

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-09-28 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 high
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1039ms20/20
  • Tool poisoning6 tool descriptions checked15/15
  • Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 1 write-action tools with no auth3/15
  • Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year9/10

Findings (1)

  • highWrite-action tools reachable without authenticationauth.open-write
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Tldraw reviews, tools and install