Is Raziel MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
How Raziel compares
Against every graded Security MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 87/100
- higher than 83% of 917 Security servers
- Tools that change things
- 5%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote Security server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 21 read · 1 change
Release history: 3 versions in the registry since 2026-08-21, latest 2026-10-29, typically one every 60 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- Code scan71 source files scanned25/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1693ms20/20
- Tool poisoning22 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 1 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancelast push 4 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year9/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 87/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Raziel does
- CrowdStrike Falcon MCP ServerConnects AI agents with CrowdStrike Falcon for security analysis and automation.not reviewedEstablishedA
- WiresharkProfessional network analysis with tshark. Security audits, deep-dives, and threat detection.not reviewedEstablishedA
- VirustotalMCP server for querying VirusTotal API with comprehensive security analysis tools.not reviewedEstablishedB