Is Tereno on Base MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
How Tereno on Base compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 81/100
- higher than 62% of 48,255 servers
- Tools that change things
- 10%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 9 read · 1 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-24 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- Code scan2 source files scanned25/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 735ms20/20
- Tool poisoning10 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 1 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancelast push 50 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ; website matches verified namespace6/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 81/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Tereno on Base does
Front-End ChecklistReview frontend code and live pages against 386 quality-gated web development rules.not reviewedWidely usedA- ReticleVerify a running web app from the inside over MCP: look, act, observe, assert. No screenshots.not reviewedEstablishedB
OneUptimeManage incidents, alerts, monitors, status pages, on-call and telemetry in OneUptime.not reviewedEstablishedA
