Is Iso27001 MCP server safe?

Probably. Read the findings first.

C68/100grade C

Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.

How Iso27001 compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 68/100; higher than 30% of 48,255 servers

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium

Code scan2 source files scanned15/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
Maintenancelast push 23 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

Findings (2)

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

dist/index.js: …ame = fn.name; var deprecatedfn = new Function( "fn", "log", "d…

mediumHeavily hex-escaped string (obfuscation)obf.hex-density

dist/index.js: …2122\u0161\u203A\u0153\uFFFD\u017E\u0178\xA0\xA1\xA2\xA3\xA4\xA5\xA6\xA7\xA8\xA9\xAA\xAB\xAC\xAD\xAE\xAF\xB0\xB1\xB2\xB3\xB4\xB5\xB6\xB7\xB8\xB9\xBA\xBB\xBC\xBD\xBE\xBF\xC0\xC1\xC2\xC3\xC4\xC5\xC6\xC7\xC8\xC9\xCA\xCB\xCC\xCD\xCE\xCF\xD0\xD1\xD2\xD3\xD4\xD5\xD6\xD7\xD8\xD9\xDA\xDB\xDC\xDD\xDE\xDF\xE0\xE1\xE2\xE3\xE4\xE5\xE6\xE7\xE8\xE9\xEA\xEB\xEC\xED\xEE\xEF\xF0\xF1\xF2\xF3\xF4\xF5\xF6\xF7\xF8\xF9\xFA\xFB\xFC\xFD\xFE\xFF" }, "win1252": "windows1252…

Overall 68/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Iso27001 reviews, tools and install