Is Japan Real Estate Intel MCP server safe?
Not recommended.
Hidden from default browsing. Significant findings or unreachable.
What to know before installing
- highRemote endpoint did not respond — fetch failed
How Japan Real Estate Intel compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 49/100
- higher than 9% of 48,243 servers
- Uptime
- 0%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-04 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- Code scan216 source files scanned25/25
- Live reliabilityremote unreachable: fetch failed0/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancerepository not readable: repo not found3/15
- Maintainer identityno repository or website to verify2/10
Findings (1)
- highRemote endpoint did not respond
reliability.unreachablefetch failed
Overall 49/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON