Is Starlog MCP server safe?

Probably. Read the findings first.

C62/100grade C

Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.

How Starlog compares

Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 62/100; higher than 18% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
Tools that change things: 0%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 3 read

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-24 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium

Code scan32 source files scanned15/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
Maintenancelast push 49 days ago12/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10

mediumnpm install lifecycle script presentinstall.script

package.json: …m run gen:facts && node build.mjs", "postinstall": "node postinstall.mjs", "prepublish…

Overall 62/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Decionis
Authorize consequential AI agent actions before execution
not reviewed
Established
A
Alibaba Cloud DashScope — Qwen
Alibaba Cloud DashScope MCP: Qwen chat, embeddings, and model discovery on your own account.
not reviewed
Established
B
Agent Security Scanner
Security layer for AI agents: blocks prompt injection, detects fake packages, scans vulnerabilities.
not reviewed
Established
C