Is Shakespeare's Monologues MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
How Shakespeare's Monologues compares
Against every graded Web search MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 86/100
- higher than 77% of 3,471 Web search servers
- Tools that change things
- 10%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote Web search server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 9 read · 1 send or post
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-29 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- Code scan4 source files scanned25/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 636ms20/20
- Tool poisoning10 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 1 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancelast push 18 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 86/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Shakespeare's Monologues does
- Brave SearchBrave Search MCP Server: web results, images, videos, rich results, AI summaries, and more.not reviewedEstablishedA
- jDocmunch MCPSection-level doc search for .md, .rst, .adoc, .org, .ipynb, .html, .yaml, .json, and OpenAPI specs.not reviewedEstablishedA
