Is Reversecore MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B77/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Reversecore MCP compares

Against every graded Security MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 77/100; higher than 55% of 915 Security servers
Tools that change things: 9%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 38 read · 3 create · 3 change

Release history: 3 versions in the registry since 2026-08-13, latest 2026-09-28, typically one every 36 days.

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium

Code scan132 source files scanned15/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

mediumsubprocess with shell=Trueexec.shell-true

reversecore_mcp-3.0.5/reversecore_mcp/core/sast/python_ast_scanner.py: … ): # Flag only if shell=True is present has_shel…

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

reversecore_mcp-3.0.5/reversecore_mcp/tools/cve_hunter/hybrid_fuzz_orchestrator.py: … sol = found_state.solver.eval(sym_input, cast_to=bytes) …

Overall 77/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

CrowdStrike Falcon MCP Server
Connects AI agents with CrowdStrike Falcon for security analysis and automation.
not reviewed
Established
A
Wireshark
Professional network analysis with tshark. Security audits, deep-dives, and threat detection.
not reviewed
Established
A
Virustotal
MCP server for querying VirusTotal API with comprehensive security analysis tools.
not reviewed
Established
B