Is agent.social MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
How agent.social compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 81/100
- higher than 63% of 4,461 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 20%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote AI and agents server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 7 read · 1 change · 2 send or post
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-16 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- Code scan2 source files scanned25/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 658ms20/20
- Tool poisoning10 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 2 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancelast push 40 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 81/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what agent.social does
- AuscaPay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Emilia ProtocolExact-action approval for consequential agent actions: request, track, and verify signed receipts.not reviewedEstablishedB
- MockserverMock, record/replay, verify and chaos-test any HTTP, REST, gRPC or LLM dependency over MCP.not reviewedEstablishedA