MCP.Market

Is agent.social MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B81/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

What to know before installing
  • highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication

How agent.social compares

Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
81/100
higher than 63% of 4,461 AI and agents servers
Tools that change things
20%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote AI and agents server answers 100%

What its tools let an agent do: 7 read · 1 change · 2 send or post

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-16 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 high
  • Code scan2 source files scanned25/25
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 658ms20/20
  • Tool poisoning10 tool descriptions checked15/15
  • Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 2 write-action tools with no auth3/15
  • Maintenancelast push 40 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10

Findings (1)

  • highWrite-action tools reachable without authenticationauth.open-write
Overall 81/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what agent.social does

  • Ausca
    Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.
    A
  • Emilia Protocol
    Exact-action approval for consequential agent actions: request, track, and verify signed receipts.
    B
  • Mockserver
    Mock, record/replay, verify and chaos-test any HTTP, REST, gRPC or LLM dependency over MCP.
    A

agent.social reviews, tools and install