Is SeekLink MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How SeekLink compares
Against every graded Web search MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 74/100
- higher than 43% of 3,470 Web search servers
- Tools that change things
- 25%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 3 read · 1 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan19 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 112 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalseeklink-0.7.0/seeklink/reranker.py: … = yes_no[0] - yes_no[1] mx.eval(self._cls_weight) except Excepti…
Overall 74/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what SeekLink does
- Markdown Vault MCPGeneric markdown vault MCP with hybrid searchnot reviewedEstablishedB
- ArxivSearch arXiv papers, download full text, semantic search, citation graphs, and alerts via MCP.not reviewedWidely usedA
- SocraticodeMCP server for enterprise local codebase indexing, semantic search, and code dependency graphs.not reviewedEstablishedB
