Is SMRITI Memory MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B78/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How SMRITI Memory compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 78/100; higher than 57% of 48,243 servers
Tools that change things: 11%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 17 read · 2 change

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-29 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium

Code scan23 source files scanned20/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 6 days ago15/15
Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ4/10

mediumsubprocess with shell=Trueexec.shell-true

smriti_memcore-1.4.17/smriti_memcore/integrations/install.py: …| bash" subprocess.run(cmd, shell=True, check=True) except Exception a…

Overall 78/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Nautilus Compass Memory
Local-first long-term memory for AI agents, with byte-recomputable signed verification receipts.
not reviewed
Established
B
Codebase Memory
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
not reviewed
Widely used
C
Neo4j Memory
MCP Neo4j Knowledge Graph Memory Server
not reviewed
Established
A