
Is ScanLabsAI Security Scanner MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
How ScanLabsAI Security Scanner compares
Against every graded Security MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 74/100
- higher than 39% of 915 Security servers
- Tools that change things
- 25%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote Security server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 6 read · 2 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- Code scan2 source files scanned25/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 689ms20/20
- Tool poisoning8 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 2 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancerepository not readable: repo not found3/15
- Maintainer identityendpoint served from the registry-verified namespace domain8/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 74/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what ScanLabsAI Security Scanner does
- Bawbel ScannerSecurity scanner for MCP servers and skill files. Detects AVE vulnerabilities before production.not reviewedGrowingB
- Security SuiteEvery GuardBee MCP security tool in one server: OWASP MCP Top 10, secrets, supply chain, TLS/DNSnot reviewedGrowingA
- MCP Security GuardAudit MCP servers for tool poisoning, rug pulls and supply-chain risk (OWASP MCP Top 10).not reviewedGrowingA