Is Memento MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
How Memento compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 65/100
- higher than 25% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan11 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 133 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ; GitHub account older than a year; website matches verified namespace7/10
Findings (2)
- mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.script - mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.scriptpackage.json: …ildinfo", "test": "vitest run", "postinstall": "node ./scripts/postinstall.mjs" } }…
Overall 65/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Memento does
- Agent RecallCorrection-first agent memory. Precision KPI tracks if agents heed warnings. 5 layers, local-only.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Basic MemoryLocal-first knowledge management with bi-directional LLM sync via Markdown files.not reviewedWidely usedB
- agent-deviceOpen source device layer for AI agents: control mobile, web, TV, and desktop apps over MCPnot reviewedWidely usedA