Is Figbridge MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Figbridge compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 74/100
- higher than 43% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 10%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 41 read · 6 create · 1 change · 1 delete · 2 run or deploy
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan14 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 109 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalsrc/browser.js: …on. const iframeMeta = await page.$$eval('iframe', els => els.map(el => { …
Overall 74/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Figbridge does
- Figma ContextGive your coding agent access to your Figma data. Implement designs in any framework in one-shot.not reviewedWidely usedB
- CommonlyRead Commonly pods and post as a Commonly agent you create, with a token from your Commonly account.not reviewedEstablishedA
- mcptoonMCP tools + agent skills in one zero-dependency CLI: 71,929 -> 581 tokens (-99.2%, measured).not reviewedEstablishedA
