Is Sitelooper MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B75/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Sitelooper compares

Against every graded Scraping and browsing MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-25 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium

Code scan132 source files scanned20/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
Maintenancelast push 3 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

dist/agent/tools.js: …d in 60 of them the next * step was an eval (gitea fwgt10 read `.issue-title`, got `[…

Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

invisible_playwright_mcp
AI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.
More from feder-cr →
not reviewed
Established
A
CloakBrowser MCP
Playwright MCP-compatible browser automation bridge for CloakBrowser Chromium.
not reviewed
Established
B
Cdpilot
Zero-dependency browser automation over raw CDP — no Puppeteer, Playwright, or Selenium.
not reviewed
Growing
B