Is ReadyAgents MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How ReadyAgents compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 82/100
- higher than 65% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 20%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 8 read · 1 create · 1 run or deploy
Release history: 8 versions in the registry since 2026-09-16, latest 2026-09-30, typically one every 1 day.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-15 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan407 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 15 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalreadyagentsdev-2.0.12/src/readyagents/cli/feedback.py: … typer.Option("eval", "--format", help="eval (default), sft, or dpo."), out: Path …
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what ReadyAgents does
- HOL GuardLocal-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.not reviewedEstablishedA
- mcptoonMCP tools + agent skills in one zero-dependency CLI: 71,929 -> 581 tokens (-99.2%, measured).not reviewedEstablishedA
yutuCLI, MCP server, and AI agent to automate YouTube workflowsnot reviewedEstablishedA
