Is Graqle MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Graqle compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 77/100
- higher than 50% of 48,255 servers
Release history: 6 versions in the registry since 2026-07-31, latest 2026-10-25, typically one every 13 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan653 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 10 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (2)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truegraqle-0.87.1/graqle/cli/commands/trustctl.py: …rocess with an explicit arg list (never shell=True).""" return subprocess.run( # noqa…
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalgraqle-0.87.1/sdk_self_audit.py: …, "subprocess.run", "subprocess.call", "eval(", "exec("]) if has_interpolatio…
Overall 77/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Graqle does
- Codebase MemoryCodebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.not reviewedWidely usedC
- SemEntity-level code intelligence: semantic diff, impact analysis, blame, and context for AI agentsnot reviewedWidely usedB
