MCP.Market

Is FreshContext MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B81/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

What to know before installing
  • highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication

How FreshContext compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
81/100
higher than 62% of 48,255 servers
Tools that change things
5%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%

What its tools let an agent do: 20 read · 1 change · 1 run or deploy

Release history: 3 versions in the registry since 2026-05-13, latest 2026-09-27, typically one every 131 days.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-31 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 high
  • Code scan82 source files scanned25/25
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1021ms20/20
  • Tool poisoning22 tool descriptions checked15/15
  • Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 1 write-action tools with no auth3/15
  • Maintenancelast push 31 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10

Findings (1)

  • highWrite-action tools reachable without authenticationauth.open-write
Overall 81/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

FreshContext reviews, tools and install