Is Valca MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Valca compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 75/100
- higher than 45% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 2 read
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-14 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan38 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 3 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (2)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalvalca-0.6.1/src/valca/rules/js_security.py: … baked into bundle VGL-JS004 HIGH eval() or new Function() with non-literal arg…
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truevalca-0.6.1/src/valca/rules/secrets.py: … "VGL-I002" name = "subprocess with shell=True" severity = Severity.HIGH # Req…
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Valca does
- Agent Security ScannerSecurity layer for AI agents: blocks prompt injection, detects fake packages, scans vulnerabilities.not reviewedEstablishedC
- HOL GuardLocal-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.not reviewedEstablishedA
- SkillsmithShare agent skills across your team, scan them for risk, and track what's actually used.not reviewedEstablishedB
