Is sayou MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How sayou compares
Against every graded Web search MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 75/100
- higher than 45% of 3,470 Web search servers
- Tools that change things
- 17%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 10 read · 2 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-09-28 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan77 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 146 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year9/10
Findings (1)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truesayou-0.2.2/agent/sandbox/manager.py: …esult = subprocess.run({repr(command)}, shell=True, capture_output=True, text=True, timeou…
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what sayou does
- OctobrainPersistent memory for AI assistants with semantic search and knowledge graph relationships.not reviewedGrowingA
RepomixPack local or remote codebases into AI-friendly files that LLMs and coding agents can read or searchnot reviewedWidely usedA
DocsMintCloud or self-hosted knowledge for AI agents: hybrid search, reranking, GraphRAG, scoped MCP tools.not reviewedEstablishedA
