Is Skimless MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Skimless compares
Against every graded E-commerce MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 85/100
- higher than 80% of 2,174 E-commerce servers
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 2 read
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan64 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 27 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truedist/patterns.js: …on: /\bos\.system\s*\(/ }, { name: "shell=True", namePt: "shell=True", expression: /\b…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Skimless does
Sessy — Amazon SES observabilityRead-only Amazon SES observability: search events, inspect bounces, pull delivery stats.not reviewedEstablishedA- Mneme MemoryCross-session memory for AI coding agents via six tools; local-first SQLite store.not reviewedEstablishedA
- OmieMCP server for Omie — ERP, customers, products, orders, invoices, financialsnot reviewedEstablishedB
