Is Openfuse MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Openfuse compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 72/100
- higher than 38% of 48,255 servers
- Tools that change things
- 31%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 7 read · 3 change · 3 send or post
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan17 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 99 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (1)
- mediumNetwork call to a raw IP address
net.raw-ipdist/registry.js: …cords const resp = await fetch(`https://1.1.1.1/dns-query?name=${encodeURIComponent(dnsN…
Overall 72/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Openfuse does
State Memory MCPPersistent workflow graph server tracking tasks, decisions, spatial entities, and blockers.not reviewedEstablishedA
KnowlPersistent memory for AI agents, for code, research and everyday life. Stale facts retire.not reviewedEstablishedA