Is PMB AI MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
What to know before installing
- highShell command built from a string (injection risk)
How PMB AI compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 66/100
- higher than 23% of 48,255 servers
- Tools that change things
- 4%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 63 read · 4 change · 2 run or deploy
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high1 medium
- Code scan172 source files scanned8/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 3 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (2)
- highShell command built from a string (injection risk)
exec.shell-concatpmb_ai-1.1.0/src/pmb/cli/commands/config.py: …ad" if os.name == "nt" else "nano") os.system(f'{editor} "{path}"') … - mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalpmb_ai-1.1.0/src/pmb/config.py: …fault - and a real-workspace " "eval (June 8 2026) with the default MiniLM emb…
Overall 66/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what PMB AI does
- Deja Vudeja-vu: local memory over the session histories of forty-three coding agents.not reviewedEstablishedA
MemorixLocal-first project memory with legacy MCP and 2026 discovery compatibility.not reviewedEstablishedB- Nautilus Compass MemoryLocal-first long-term memory for AI agents, with byte-recomputable signed verification receipts.not reviewedEstablishedB