Is no_human MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B75/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.8 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium

Code scan230 source files scanned15/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

no_human-0.2.3/src/no_human/config.py: …: True, }, # The nightly funnel eval (Phase C). The only knob it has: a run RE…

mediumsubprocess with shell=Trueexec.shell-true

no_human-0.2.3/src/no_human/core/orchestrator.py: …ocess.run( cmd, shell=True, capture_output=True, text=True, …

Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Mac Control
Full macOS control — drive a Mac like a human: shell, AppleScript, files, and human-like GUI.
not reviewed
Growing
A
AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server
Nextcloud MCP server — files, calendar, contacts, mail, maps, notes, tasks & 120+ more tools
not reviewed
Established
C
Open Agreements
Fill standard legal agreement templates (NDAs, SAFEs, NVCA docs, employment) as DOCX files.
not reviewed
Established
A