Is no_human MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How no_human compares
Against every graded Productivity MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 75/100
- higher than 40% of 1,299 Productivity servers
- Tools that change things
- 50%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 1 read · 1 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-15 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan230 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 6 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (2)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalno_human-0.2.3/src/no_human/config.py: …: True, }, # The nightly funnel eval (Phase C). The only knob it has: a run RE…
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-trueno_human-0.2.3/src/no_human/core/orchestrator.py: …ocess.run( cmd, shell=True, capture_output=True, text=True, …
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what no_human does
SvGridChecks AI-written SvGrid code against the real API, plus version-pinned Svelte 5 grid docs.not reviewedEstablishedA- RevoGrid DataGrid MCP ProHosted Pro MCP server for RevoGrid DataGrid docs, examples, feature checks, and migration guidance.not reviewedEstablishedA
AIquila — Nextcloud MCP ServerNextcloud MCP server — 345 tools: files, calendar, contacts, mail, Talk, Deck, photos, maps, notesnot reviewedEstablishedC
