Is XActions MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
What to know before installing
- highShell command built from a string (injection risk)
How XActions compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 57/100
- higher than 12% of 48,114 servers
- Tools that change things
- 12%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 88 read · 12 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high1 medium
- Code scan306 source files scanned8/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 2 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (2)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalsrc/agents/browserDriver.js: … const tweets = await this.page.$$eval(S.tweet, (articles) => { return … - highShell command built from a string (injection risk)
exec.shell-concatsrc/plugins/manager.js: … name if (!isLocal) { try { execSync(`npm install ${name}`, { stdio: 'pipe', cwd: process.cw…
Overall 57/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what XActions does
- EdgarToolsOpen-source SEC EDGAR toolkit — 13 tools, 7 prompts, every filing type. No API key required.not reviewedWidely usedA
