Is Neurarch MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Neurarch compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 82/100
- higher than 65% of 4,461 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 14%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 33 read · 3 create · 4 change · 2 delete
Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-09-01, latest 2026-10-20, typically one every 48 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-29 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan4 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 6 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/index.js: … ${className}() `; code += ` model.eval() `; const GRAPH_EXAMPLE_NODES = 4; …
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Neurarch does
- Doc BridgeResolve documentation ownership, edit roots, checks, and human handoffs before an agent edits code.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Basic MemoryLocal-first knowledge management with bi-directional LLM sync via Markdown files.not reviewedWidely usedB
- DecionisAuthorize consequential AI agent actions before executionnot reviewedEstablishedA
