Is Navig MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
What to know before installing
- highShell command built from a string (injection risk)
How Navig compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 57/100
- higher than 12% of 48,255 servers
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high2 medium
- Code scan1500 source files scanned3/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (3)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truenavig-3.27.5/navig/agent/action_registry.py: …s.run, cmd_str, shell=True, capture_output=True, …
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalnavig-3.27.5/navig/commands/eval.py: … context will be empty result = eval(expression, {"__builtins__": {}}, ctx) … - highShell command built from a string (injection risk)
exec.shell-concatnavig-3.27.5/navig/desktop/tray_app.py: …echo.' try: subprocess.Popen(f'cmd /k "{init}"', creationflags=subproce…
Overall 57/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
