Is Crg MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Crg compares
Against every graded Web search MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 75/100
- higher than 50% of 3,233 Web search servers
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 6 read
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-14 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan57 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truebetter_code_review_graph-3.30.0/rules/heuristic/cwe-78-shell-command-sink.yaml: …and injection -- subprocess called with shell=True …
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Crg does
- not reviewedEstablishedA
Shodh MemoryCognitive memory for AI agents — semantic search, Hebbian learning, knowledge graphs.not reviewedEstablishedC- CodeseekerGraph-powered code intelligence with semantic search and knowledge graph for AI assistantsnot reviewedGrowingC