Is Tradememory Protocol MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B83/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Tradememory Protocol compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 83/100; higher than 65% of 48,255 servers
Tools that change things: 18%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 18 read · 1 create · 2 change · 1 run or deploy

Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-09-08, latest 2026-10-02, typically one every 24 days.

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-15 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium

Code scan116 source files scanned20/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 6 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10

mediumsubprocess with shell=Trueexec.shell-true

tradememory_protocol-0.5.6/src/tradememory/onboarding/setup_wizard.py: …_install_cmd"], shell=True, capture_output…

Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

SSH Manager
SSH for AI agents: commands, files, backups and health, with approval, a vault and an audit trail
not reviewed
Established
A
State Memory MCP
Persistent workflow graph server tracking tasks, decisions, spatial entities, and blockers.
not reviewed
Established
A