Is Kubeview MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Kubeview compares
Against every graded Developer tools MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 75/100
- higher than 40% of 1,119 Developer tools servers
- Tools that change things
- 2%
- typical: 5%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 53 read · 1 change
Release history: 4 versions in the registry since 2026-09-02, latest 2026-10-17, typically one every 12 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan408 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 9 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/src/agent/runtime/ivm/IVMSandboxManager.js: …soleBridge); await this.context.eval(` (() => { const bridg…
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Kubeview does
- KSailSDK for creating, managing, and operating Kubernetes clusters and workloads with ease.not reviewedGrowingA
- KubentlyTroubleshoot Kubernetes agentically: natural-language cluster diagnosis via ask_kubentlynot reviewedGrowingB
- Strimzi Kafka CLIManage Apache Kafka on Kubernetes via Strimzi. Clusters, topics, users, connectors, MM2.not reviewedGrowingA