Is Jooq MCP server safe?
Not recommended.
Hidden from default browsing. Significant findings or unreachable.
What to know before installing
- highRemote endpoint did not respond — SSE error: Non-200 status code (404)
How Jooq compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 47/100
- higher than 9% of 48,114 servers
- Uptime
- 0%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-29 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote unreachable: SSE error: Non-200 status code (404)0/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityno auth information5/15
- Maintenancelast push 2 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityendpoint served from the registry-verified namespace domain8/10
Findings (1)
- highRemote endpoint did not respond
reliability.unreachableSSE error: Non-200 status code (404)
Overall 47/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON