Is Termdat MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A85/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Termdat compares

Against every graded Databases MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 85/100; higher than 65% of 802 Databases servers
Tools that change things: 0%; typical: 10%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 7 read

Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-08-02, latest 2026-09-19, typically one every 48 days.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium

Code scan19 source files scanned20/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 7 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

Findings (1)

mediumsubprocess with shell=Trueexec.shell-true

termdat_mcp-0.2.0/audits/2026-07-20T135154-Z-termdat-mcp/verification-results.json: …ce": [ "No os.system/subprocess/shell=True/eval/exec/os.popen anywhere in src/ (gr…

Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Other servers that do what Termdat does

CogniCore
Memory, reflection and safety for AI agents. Hosted or local, no vector database.
5.0(1)
Growing
A
DBHub
Token-efficient database MCP server for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLite
not reviewed
Widely used
A
Neo4j Cypher
A simple Neo4j MCP server that allows you to run Cypher queries against a Neo4j database.
More from neo4j-contrib →
not reviewed
Established
A

Termdat reviews, tools and install