Is Dali by Lulu MCP server safe?
Not recommended.
Hidden from default browsing. Significant findings or unreachable.
What to know before installing
- highRemote endpoint did not respond — AbortError: This operation was aborted
How Dali by Lulu compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 54/100
- higher than 13% of 4,456 AI and agents servers
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 3%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 0%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote AI and agents server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 16 read
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-25 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high1 medium
- Code scan10 source files scanned20/25
- Live reliabilityremote unreachable: AbortError: This operation was aborted0/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 104 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (2)
- highRemote endpoint did not respond
reliability.unreachableAbortError: This operation was aborted
- mediumNetwork call to a raw IP address
net.raw-ipdali_mcp-0.6.1/smithery.yaml: …omepage: https://dali.getlulu.dev icon: http://8.233.24.23/dali-logo.svg startCommand: type: htt…
Overall 54/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Safer options for the same job
- DecionisAuthorize consequential AI agent actions before executionnot reviewedEstablishedA
- Agent-Native SlidesAgent-Native Google Slides - generate and edit React presentationsnot reviewedEstablishedA
- PaperBananaGenerate academic diagrams and statistical plots from text using multi-agent AI.not reviewedEstablishedA