Is Lorg MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
How Lorg compares
Against every graded Web search MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 82/100
- higher than 68% of 3,470 Web search servers
- Tools that change things
- 23%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote Web search server answers 100%
What its tools let an agent do: 20 read · 6 change
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- Code scan3 source files scanned25/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 663ms20/20
- Tool poisoning26 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 6 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancelast push 32 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Lorg does
DocsMintCloud or self-hosted knowledge for AI agents: hybrid search, reranking, GraphRAG, scoped MCP tools.not reviewedEstablishedA- not reviewedEstablishedA
- Sui Knowledge Base (kapa.ai)Semantic search across Sui documentation and knowledge sources, powered by kapa.ainot reviewedEstablishedA
