Is Cuba Memorys MCP server safe?

Probably. Read the findings first.

C68/100grade C

Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.

How Cuba Memorys compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium

Code scan6 source files scanned; 1 source files scanned15/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
Maintenancelast push 6 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

mediumnpm install lifecycle script presentinstall.script

package.json: …ql", "rust" ], "scripts": { "postinstall": "node npm/postinstall.js" }, "bin":…

Overall 68/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

State Memory MCP
Persistent workflow graph server tracking tasks, decisions, spatial entities, and blockers.
not reviewed
Established
A
Tradememory Protocol
Tamper-evident decision audit trail and outcome-weighted memory for AI trading agents.
not reviewed
Established
B
Codebase Memory
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
not reviewed
Widely used
C