Is Stashpad MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Stashpad compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 72/100
- higher than 40% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan36 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 8 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalsrc/cli.mjs: …2)); } else { io.stdout(`Stashpad eval (${report.data})`); io.stdout(`Models…
Overall 72/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Stashpad does
- Basic MemoryLocal-first knowledge management with bi-directional LLM sync via Markdown files.not reviewedWidely usedB
- IWE (iwe.md)Markdown knowledge base as agent memory. Runs against the notes directory it is started in.not reviewedEstablishedA
- MemantoMCP server for Memanto - persistent semantic memory for any MCP-compatible agentnot reviewedEstablishedA
