Is WunderUI MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
What to know before installing
- highNetwork call to a paste/tunnel/webhook host
How WunderUI compares
Against every graded Media MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 74/100
- higher than 46% of 1,253 Media servers
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 5%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 11 read
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-13 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- Code scan3 source files scanned13/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 3 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- highNetwork call to a paste/tunnel/webhook host
net.suspicious-hostdata/design.json: …com/components/toast", "source": "https://github.com/wunder-ui/wunderui/blob/main/components/ui/toast.tsx", "sourceRaw": "https://raw.gi…
Overall 74/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what WunderUI does
- DembrandtDesign tokens from any live site: colours, type, spacing, components, drift against a baseline.not reviewedWidely usedB
- melta UIAI-Ready design system MCP: melta UI tokens, component contracts, 107 rules, check_html self-verifynot reviewedEstablishedA
- TypeUIDesign systems, UI prompts, and layout variations for AI coding tools.not reviewedEstablishedA