Is b123d-print MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How b123d-print compares
Against every graded Media MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 85/100
- higher than 73% of 1,253 Media servers
- Tools that change things
- 15%
- typical: 5%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 24 read · 6 create · 3 change
Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-10-23, latest 2026-10-24, typically one every 2 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-25 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan59 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalb123d_print-0.3.13/src/b123d_print/edges.py: …mType.LINE)...", ...} part = fillet(eval(sel["expr"]), radius=1) # in the scrip…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what b123d-print does
melta UIAI-Ready design system MCP: melta UI tokens, component contracts, 107 rules, check_html self-verifynot reviewedEstablishedA
CodesignLocal design engine for AI agents: create, edit and export real, editable designs.not reviewedEstablishedA
KilnKiln MCP server for agents: design, slice, print, monitor, and recover physical objects safely.not reviewedEstablishedB