Mmcp.market

Is Sovereignty Scan MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B83/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 115ms (auth required)20/20
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualityauth enforced (unknown)9/15
  • Maintenancelast push 18 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what Sovereignty Scan does

  • Healthclaw Guardrails
    Guardrailed FHIR access for AI agents: PHI redaction, audit trail, step-up auth, tenant isolation
    A
  • Kastell
    Server security audit (413 checks), hardening, and fleet management across 4 cloud providers.
    B
  • Bastion
    Reliability + security proxy for MCP: runtime tool-security and a compliance-mapped audit trail.
    A

Sovereignty Scan reviews, tools and install