Is Jotbus MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B82/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

How Jotbus compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 82/100; higher than 63% of 48,255 servers
Tools that change things: 33%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 2 read · 1 create

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-09 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 medium

Code scan2 source files scanned20/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ; website matches verified namespace6/10

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

dist/index.js: …&&(l=this.opts.code.process(l,e));let p=new Function(`${qr.default.self}`,`${qr.default.scope…

Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Claudexor
Route coding work across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenCode with shared context.
not reviewed
Established
A