MCP.Market

Is Splitbill MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B83/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

What to know before installing
  • highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication

How Splitbill compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
83/100
higher than 65% of 48,255 servers
Tools that change things
33%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Uptime
96%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%

What its tools let an agent do: 2 read · 1 create

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 high
  • Code scan4 source files scanned25/25
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 3298ms17/20
  • Tool poisoning3 tool descriptions checked15/15
  • Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 1 write-action tools with no auth3/15
  • Maintenancelast push 15 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityendpoint served from the registry-verified namespace domain8/10

Findings (1)

  • highWrite-action tools reachable without authenticationauth.open-write
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Splitbill reviews, tools and install